Category Trending Topics

📰 What’s Happened So Far on the Pahalgam Attack

On April 22, a brutal terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, left 27 people dead, including 25 Indian nationals. The attackers targeted tourists in a scenic area that’s usually considered peaceful and safe. The news shook the entire nation, and the response from the government has been swift and serious.

🇮🇳 Actions Taken So Far

1. PM Modi Cut Short His Saudi Visit
   As soon as the news broke, Prime Minister Narendra Modi ended his Saudi trip early and returned to lead from the front.

2. High-Level Security Meeting
   Modi chaired a meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Security to evaluate the situation and coordinate the response. An all-party meeting is also set for today to ensure a united front.

3. Stricter Border Measures
   India has shut down the Attari-Wagah land border with Pakistan. Not just that, the government has also pulled out of the Indus Waters Treaty, a big diplomatic move.

4. Pakistani Diplomat Expelled
   India summoned Pakistan’s top diplomat in Delhi and expelled certain Pakistani military officials in protest, holding Pakistan-based terror outfits responsible.

5. Security Operations Intensified
   A large-scale manhunt is underway in and around Pahalgam. Security forces are combing the region, and extra troops have been sent to plug any gaps.

6. Focus on Pilgrim Safety
   With the annual Amarnath Yatra around the corner—which passes through Pahalgam—the government is reviewing and beefing up security to keep pilgrims safe.

👤 What Has Modi Said?

Modi didn’t mince words. He called the attack a “cowardly and barbaric act” and said clearly, “They will not be spared. Our fight against terrorism is only going to get stronger.” His message was one of determination and resolve.

🕵️‍♂️ Who’s Behind the Attack?

Investigations point to Saifullah Kasuri aka Khalid, a commander of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Pakistan-based terror group, as the mastermind. Intelligence agencies are tracking him down as part of the ongoing operation.

🔮 What’s Next? What Will Modi Do?

Knowing Modi’s track record, here’s what can be expected:

• Tougher counter-terror measures—especially in border areas and Kashmir.

• More international pressure on Pakistan—India is likely to raise the issue at global forums again.

• Permanent military presence in sensitive regions like Baisaran Valley to prevent future attacks.

• A strong retaliation might be in the works—either diplomatically or militarily, depending on how things unfold.

The government is treating this not just as a terror strike but as an attack on the soul of the nation.

So the response will be firm, strategic, and possibly long-term.

want more content?
visit us

Other Website :
Momdadsphere

Pahalgam Terror Attack 2025: A Comprehensive Overview

On April 22, 2025, the serene Baisaran meadow near Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir witnessed a devastating terror attack, marking one of the deadliest assaults on civilians in the region in recent years. Militants affiliated with The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba, targeted tourists, resulting in significant casualties and sparking widespread condemnation.​

Around 2:50 PM IST, four to six militants, disguised in military-style uniforms, emerged from the surrounding forests of Baisaran meadow—a popular tourist destination often referred to as “Mini Switzerland.” They opened fire on a group of tourists, leading to chaos and panic. Eyewitnesses reported that the attackers posed as policemen, asking for names before suddenly opening fire, targeting men while sparing most women. Some survivors recounted that the assailants singled out non-Muslims, asking victims to recite the kalma and checking for circumcision. Those who failed were shot. ​Wikipedia

Casualties

The attack claimed the lives of at least 28 individuals, including 24 Indian tourists from various states such as Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Odisha, Gujarat, Haryana, West Bengal, and Uttar Pradesh. Two locals from Jammu and Kashmir and two foreign tourists from Nepal and the United Arab Emirates were also among the deceased. Notably, a 26-year-old Indian Navy officer and an Intelligence Bureau official were killed. Over 20 others sustained injuries, with some in critical condition.

Perpetrators and Motive

The Resistance Front (TRF) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was in protest against the alleged demographic changes in the Kashmir Valley due to the settlement of over 85,000 “outsiders.” The group, linked to the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, has been involved in previous militant activities in the region. ​The New Indian Express+2Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2

Government and Security Response

In the aftermath, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi cut short his visit to Saudi Arabia, emphasizing that those responsible would be brought to justice. Union Home Minister Amit Shah traveled to Srinagar to assess the situation and coordinate the security response. Security forces launched a manhunt to apprehend the perpetrators, and a helpline was established to assist affected tourists. A joint search and cordon operation involving local police and the Indian Army was initiated, with helicopters deployed to locate the attackers. ​

I have shared a Instagram video of our page :
Click here to Watch

In this video, lady claim that terrorist when hit her husband and wanted to kill her tooo.
he replied : Modi se kaho !

Global Reactions

The international community condemned the attack. U.S. President Donald Trump expressed solidarity with India, stating, “The United States stands strong with India against terrorism.” Russian President Vladimir Putin labeled the incident a “brutal crime” with no justification and emphasized that the perpetrators would face deserved punishment. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs also expressed their condolences and condemned the act.

Impact on Tourism and Local Economy

Pahalgam, known for its picturesque landscapes and as a starting point for the Amarnath Yatra, has been a significant tourist destination. This attack has raised concerns about the safety of tourists and could potentially impact the local economy, which heavily relies on tourism. Authorities have urged travelers to remain vigilant and have increased security measures in the region

Historical Context

The Kashmir region has a history of insurgency and militant attacks. The 2025 Pahalgam attack is reminiscent of the 2000 Amarnath pilgrimage massacre, where between 89 and 105 people were killed in coordinated attacks by Islamist militants in Anantnag and Doda districts. Such incidents highlight the persistent challenges in ensuring security and stability in the region.

Conclusion

The 2025 Pahalgam terror attack stands as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges in Jammu and Kashmir. As investigations continue and security measures are reinforced, the resilience of the local communities and the support from the international community play crucial roles in navigating the path forward.​

Note: This article is based on available information as of April 23, 2025. For the latest updates, please refer to official news sources and government advisories.

Key Provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024

You May Like : Waqf Board History , Structure and Functioning

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, has been a subject of intense debate, bringing significant changes to the management of Waqf properties in India. The government claims that these amendments are aimed at enhancing transparency, preventing misuse, and modernizing the governance of Waqf assets. However, critics argue that the bill could infringe upon the rights of the Muslim community and reduce their control over these properties.

Below is a detailed breakdown of the key provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 and its potential impact.

1. Inclusion of Non-Muslims in Waqf Boards

One of the most debated provisions in the bill is the inclusion of non-Muslim members in the administration of Waqf properties. Earlier, Waqf Boards were exclusively governed by Muslim members, as Waqf properties are religious endowments under Islamic law.

Why the Change?

• The government argues that adding non-Muslims to the boards will increase transparency and reduce mismanagement.

• It claims that diverse representation can help improve administration and oversight.

Concerns & Opposition

• Many Muslim organizations and political parties believe that this move dilutes Muslim autonomy over their religious institutions.

• Critics fear that non-Muslim members may not fully understand the religious significance of Waqf properties.

2. Government Authority Over Waqf Property Ownership Disputes

The bill proposes that government agencies will have the final authority to decide ownership of disputed Waqf properties.

Purpose of the Amendment

• The government argues that many Waqf properties have unclear ownership records, leading to land disputes and corruption.

• Centralizing decision-making under government agencies is intended to speed up conflict resolution and prevent illegal occupation of Waqf lands.

Criticism & Concerns

• Opponents argue that this change undermines the independence of Waqf institutions.

• There are concerns that the government may misuse this power to take over valuable Waqf properties.

• Some fear that this could lead to the loss of historic mosques, graveyards, and other religious structures.

3. Removal of ‘ Waqf by User’ Concept

One of the biggest changes in the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, is the removal of the ‘Waqf by user’ provision.

What is ‘Waqf by User’?

• Earlier, if a property had been used for religious purposes for a long time (even without official documentation), it could be legally recognized as Waqf land.

Why Was It Removed?

• The government claims that this provision has been misused to declare public or private land as Waqf property without proper documentation.

• Authorities argue that this change will prevent land disputes and unauthorized property claims.

Impact & Controversy

• Many Muslim groups argue that the removal of this provision will result in the loss of historical mosques, shrines, and cemeteries that do not have official land records.

• Critics fear that it could allow the government to seize Waqf properties that have been in use for centuries.

4. Restrictions on Who Can Dedicate Land to Waqf

The new bill introduces a mandatory eligibility requirement for individuals donating land to Waqf.

New Rules

• Only individuals who have been practicing Muslims for at least five years can dedicate land to Waqf.

• This is intended to prevent fraudulent donations and ensure that Waqf properties are legitimately endowed.

Why is This Controversial?

• Some critics argue that this unnecessarily restricts who can contribute to Waqf, potentially reducing charitable donations.

• Others feel that this provision could be misused to block genuine land donations.

5. Digitization of Waqf Property Records

To increase transparency, the bill mandates the digitization of Waqf property records.

Objectives

• Create a centralized digital database of all Waqf properties.

• Make property details publicly accessible to prevent encroachments and fraud.

• Use technology to streamline Waqf management and improve efficiency.

Potential Benefits

• Reduces paperwork errors and loss of records.

• Helps in tracking illegal encroachments.

• Enables faster dispute resolution.

Challenges & Concerns

• Critics argue that digitization alone will not solve mismanagement issues.

• Some fear that data manipulation or misrepresentation of records could lead to unjust property takeovers.

6. Strengthened Legal Actions Against Misuse of Waqf Property

The bill introduces stricter penalties for the misuse, illegal sale, or encroachment of Waqf properties.

New Legal Provisions

• Harsher punishments for those found guilty of misusing Waqf properties.

• Increased government authority to take action against illegal occupations.

Why is This Important?

• Waqf properties have historically been vulnerable to illegal takeovers.

• This amendment aims to protect religious assets and ensure they are used for their intended purposes.

Criticism

• Some argue that the government could use these laws selectively to target specific individuals or groups.

• Others fear that stricter laws could discourage private investments in Waqf institutions.

7. Addressing Women’s Inheritance Rights

The bill aims to ensure that women are not denied inheritance rights in Waqf properties.

Why is This Important?

• In many cases, women have been excluded from inheriting Waqf properties due to cultural and legal complexities.

• The new amendment seeks to prevent discrimination and ensure equal access to Waqf assets.

Expected Impact

• Strengthens women’s property rights within the Waqf system.

• Encourages greater participation of women in Waqf administration.

Challenges

• Some religious groups may oppose reforms that challenge traditional inheritance practices.

• Effective implementation will require strong legal enforcement.

Conclusion: Balancing Reform and Religious Rights

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, introduces significant changes aimed at improving transparency, reducing corruption, and modernizing Waqf administration. However, the bill has also sparked controversy and strong opposition, especially among Muslim groups who fear that these changes could undermine their religious rights.

Key Takeaways:

✔️ Transparency & Digitization – Modernizing Waqf management can help prevent corruption.
✔️ Increased Government Control – May improve efficiency but also raises concerns about property seizures.
✔️ Impact on Muslim Autonomy – Inclusion of non-Muslims and ownership disputes are contentious issues.
✔️ Legal & Social Challenges – Effective implementation will require strong legal safeguards.

As the bill progresses through legislative debates, its long-term impact on Waqf properties and Muslim religious rights remains to be seen. Whether this amendment truly benefits Waqf management or leads to greater disputes will depend on how it is implemented and enforced in the coming years.

Introduction to the Waqf Board :

You May Like :  WAQF Board Current Controversies

The Waqf Board plays a pivotal role in managing and safeguarding Islamic endowments, known as waqfs, which are assets donated for religious or charitable purposes in Islam. These assets can include land, buildings, or other properties intended to support mosques, educational institutions, orphanages, and other charitable endeavors. The concept of waqf has been integral to Islamic society for centuries, ensuring that donated assets serve the community perpetually.

Historical Background of Waqf Board in India

The tradition of waqf in India dates back to the early days of Islamic influence in the subcontinent. Over the centuries, numerous rulers and philanthropists established waqfs to support various social and religious causes. Recognizing the need for organized management of these endowments, the Indian government enacted the Waqf Act of 1954, which was later replaced by the Waqf Act of 1995. This legislation provided a comprehensive framework for the administration of waqf properties and established Waqf Boards in each state to oversee their management.

Structure and Functions of the Waqf Board

Each state in India has its own Waqf Board, constituted under the provisions of the Waqf Act. The primary functions of these boards include:

• Registration of Waqf Properties: Ensuring all waqf properties are officially recorded and documented.

• Management and Development: Supervising the maintenance and development of waqf properties to ensure they serve their intended purposes.

• Protection from Encroachment: Safeguarding waqf properties from illegal occupation or misuse.

• Financial Oversight: Monitoring the income generated from waqf properties and ensuring it is utilized appropriately for charitable activities.

Recent Legislative Developments: The Waqf Board  (Amendment) Bill, 2024

In August 2024, the Indian government introduced the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, proposing significant changes to the existing Waqf Act of 1995. The key amendments include:

• Inclusion of Non-Muslim Members: The bill proposes that non-Muslims can be appointed to the Central Waqf Council and state Waqf Boards. Specifically, it mandates the inclusion of at least two non-Muslim members in these bodies. This move aims to promote diversity but has raised concerns about potential interference in the management of Islamic endowments.

• Survey of Waqf Properties: The responsibility of surveying waqf properties, previously assigned to a Survey Commissioner, is proposed to be transferred to the District Collector or Magistrate. Critics argue that this could lead to increased government control over waqf assets.

• Ownership of Disputed Properties: The bill states that any government property identified as waqf will cease to be so. In cases of uncertainty, the District Collector will determine ownership and update revenue records accordingly. This provision has sparked fears of potential usurpation of waqf properties.

• Criteria for Declaring Waqf: Only individuals who have practiced Islam for at least five years may declare a waqf, and they must own the property being declared. This aims to ensure authenticity but has been viewed by some as restrictive.

Controversies and Criticisms Surrounding the Amendments

The proposed amendments have elicited strong reactions from various quarters:

• Concerns Over Autonomy: Muslim organizations, including the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), have expressed apprehensions that the inclusion of non-Muslim members could undermine the autonomy of Waqf Boards. They argue that managing Islamic endowments should remain within the purview of the Muslim community.

• Potential for Property Usurpation: Critics fear that transferring the authority to determine property ownership to government officials could lead to the confiscation of waqf properties, especially those lacking formal documentation due to their historical nature.

• Political Motivations: Opposition parties have labeled the bill as politically motivated, suggesting it aims to weaken minority rights and exert greater control over Muslim assets.

Government’s Justification for the Amendments

The government asserts that the amendments are designed to:

• Enhance Transparency: By including members from diverse backgrounds, the management of waqf properties can benefit from varied perspectives, leading to more transparent operations.

• Curb Corruption: Increased oversight and revised management structures aim to address issues of mismanagement and corruption that have plagued some Waqf Boards.

• Promote Inclusivity: The inclusion of non-Muslim members is presented as a step towards fostering communal harmony and inclusive governance.

Latest Developments and News

As of April 2025, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, has been a focal point of parliamentary debates:

• Parliamentary Discussions: The bill has been tabled in the Lok Sabha, with intense debates between the ruling party and the opposition. While the government emphasizes the need for reform, opposition parties and Muslim organizations continue to voice strong objections.

• Public Protests: Various Muslim groups have organized protests across the country, demanding the withdrawal of the bill. They view it as an infringement on their religious rights and an attempt to seize control of community assets.

• Judicial Challenges: Legal experts anticipate potential challenges in the courts, questioning the constitutional validity of the proposed amendments, especially concerning the rights of religious minorities to manage their own affairs.

Current Situation:

As of early April 2025, the bill is being debated in India’s parliament. The discussions are expected to be intense, reflecting the bill’s contentious nature. The outcome of these deliberations will have significant implications for the management of waqf properties and the broader discourse on minority rights in India

If you wanna know more about visionaries like this, we’ve got it covered! 🚀